News, reviews, and opinions on all facets of entertainment. Please take a moment to click on the ads, this helps fund the site, and we'd be grateful.
Monday, March 26, 2012
Political Minute: Third Party Candidates
Today, I was curious as to who else was running for president besides the obvious Obama, and whoever wins the Republican Primary. Boy, was I surprised when I came across this list of candidates.
36 Democrats
90 Republicans
5 Americans Elect
1 Americas Party
10 Constitutional Party
7 Green Party
1 Justice Party
17 Libertarians
3 Socialists
1 Prohibition Party
2 Reform Party
102 Independent/Write-in Candidates
For a total of 275 Candidates this election year.
Personally, I find this to be completely ridiculous, but also side splitting funny. There are at least 85 candidates that are running as complete jokes. This article might run a little long, but bear with me, as it should be quite entertaining.
Bob Ely, Democrat(http://workmorekeepless.com/): One of my personal favorites. His website boasts "A half dozen reasons to vote for me."
Jeff Siggins, Write-in(http://www.jeffprezpope.com/): He's running for both president and pope. What more can I say?
Mike "Doc" Witort, Write-in(http://www.wakeupwell.org/):
The Naked Cowboy, Republican(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_Cowboy#Presidential_candidacy.2C_2012): Yep, that's right, the singing sensation that runs around in his briefs is running.
J. Pall Hadd(https://twitter.com/#!/JPHaddadi): Here's what he says about himself. "Founder of a holiday (Uncle's Day, First Wednesday in January.) Presidential candidate. Re-inventor of the wheel and other popular items."
Jimmy McMillan, Democrat(http://www.rentistoodamnhigh.org/): THE RENT IS TOO DAMN HIGH!
Mike Moloney(http://www.mikemoloneyforpresident.com/): I don't even...
Ole' Savior, Republican(http://www.olesavior.org/): Pretty serious candidate, except the whole "Ole' Savior" thing.
Roseanne, Democrat(http://www.roseanneworld.com/blog/home.php): It's Roseanne. Vote for her.
Rutherford B. Hayes(http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/10/rutherford-b-hayes-interview): I mean, with a name like that, how could you not vote for him? He's quick to point out in his interview that he is by no means related to "the disgraced and undemocratically elected nineteenth president, Rutherford Birchard Hayes"
Aleister Crowley(http://ac2012.com/): Yes, he's dead. No, he wasn't an American citizen. Seems legit.
Vermin Supreme, Democrat(http://www.verminsupreme.com/): He's a meme. He wears a boot on his head. He promises free ponies to all Americans. His first law will be mandatory dental hygiene. He's got my vote.
Okay, this last guy is my personal favorite. President Emperor Caesar, ALL PARTIES(http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P8000322: The only thing you can find on this guy is his Certificate of Candidacy. I'm completely in love with this guy. If only I could find more about him.
With 275 candidates, I'm sure there's more silly candidates. Do some research and find out who's the right one for you.
36 Democrats
90 Republicans
5 Americans Elect
1 Americas Party
10 Constitutional Party
7 Green Party
1 Justice Party
17 Libertarians
3 Socialists
1 Prohibition Party
2 Reform Party
102 Independent/Write-in Candidates
For a total of 275 Candidates this election year.
Personally, I find this to be completely ridiculous, but also side splitting funny. There are at least 85 candidates that are running as complete jokes. This article might run a little long, but bear with me, as it should be quite entertaining.
Bob Ely, Democrat(http://workmorekeepless.com/): One of my personal favorites. His website boasts "A half dozen reasons to vote for me."
Jeff Siggins, Write-in(http://www.jeffprezpope.com/): He's running for both president and pope. What more can I say?
Mike "Doc" Witort, Write-in(http://www.wakeupwell.org/):
"Doc" Mike is NOT approved by the American Medical Association.
"Doc" Mike is NOT approved by the Illinois Attorney General.
"Doc" Mike is NOT approved by the American Cancer Society.
"Doc" Mike is NOT approved by the American Heart Association.
"Doc" Mike is NOT approved by the American Diabetes Association.
"Doc" Mike is NOT approved by the Illionois Autism Society.
Yet, he knows what's best for America
J. Pall Hadd(https://twitter.com/#!/JPHaddadi): Here's what he says about himself. "Founder of a holiday (Uncle's Day, First Wednesday in January.) Presidential candidate. Re-inventor of the wheel and other popular items."
Jimmy McMillan, Democrat(http://www.rentistoodamnhigh.org/): THE RENT IS TOO DAMN HIGH!
Mike Moloney(http://www.mikemoloneyforpresident.com/): I don't even...
Ole' Savior, Republican(http://www.olesavior.org/): Pretty serious candidate, except the whole "Ole' Savior" thing.
Roseanne, Democrat(http://www.roseanneworld.com/blog/home.php): It's Roseanne. Vote for her.
Rutherford B. Hayes(http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/10/rutherford-b-hayes-interview): I mean, with a name like that, how could you not vote for him? He's quick to point out in his interview that he is by no means related to "the disgraced and undemocratically elected nineteenth president, Rutherford Birchard Hayes"
Aleister Crowley(http://ac2012.com/): Yes, he's dead. No, he wasn't an American citizen. Seems legit.
Vermin Supreme, Democrat(http://www.verminsupreme.com/): He's a meme. He wears a boot on his head. He promises free ponies to all Americans. His first law will be mandatory dental hygiene. He's got my vote.
Okay, this last guy is my personal favorite. President Emperor Caesar, ALL PARTIES(http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?P8000322: The only thing you can find on this guy is his Certificate of Candidacy. I'm completely in love with this guy. If only I could find more about him.
With 275 candidates, I'm sure there's more silly candidates. Do some research and find out who's the right one for you.
Saturday, March 24, 2012
The Book Store, Extras
Greetings, Ladies and Gentlemen, this is Dresden.
So I realized recently that I've been giving really good scores to books that I've read, and I figured that I should be clearer as to why that is.
See, I don't really read books that I don't like. I can't finish them, and for that matter, I usually enjoy books once I start reading them, and that perhaps colors my perception. For my next review, I'll do one of the few books I truly hated.
As always, this is Dresden, signing off.
So I realized recently that I've been giving really good scores to books that I've read, and I figured that I should be clearer as to why that is.
See, I don't really read books that I don't like. I can't finish them, and for that matter, I usually enjoy books once I start reading them, and that perhaps colors my perception. For my next review, I'll do one of the few books I truly hated.
As always, this is Dresden, signing off.
The Book Store 7
Good Evening, Ladies and Gents, this is Dresden for The Book Store.
Today, I'll be reviewing "Revenge of the Sith" by Matthew Stover. This is the novelization of the third Star Wars movie, so I'm not even going to bother putting any plot in. You all know how this story goes, and if you don't, stop what you're doing, turn off your computer, and go to your local video rental store and get the movie. Then watch it. Watch it until your eyes bleed.
Welcome back, hope you enjoyed that experience. Though I'm usually a bit leery of books written about a movie, I thoroughly enjoyed this version of the third chapter in the classic Star Wars story. It adhered to the plot of the movie exceptionally well, and, at the same time, improved on the faults of the movie's narrative. I especially loved how Stover threw in so much symbolism and allegory, yet still kept the novel believable and fast paced. The characterization in this book is much deeper than even in the movie, and I loved every second of Stover's magnificent writing.
Review Score: 9/10
As always, this is Dresden, signing off.
Today, I'll be reviewing "Revenge of the Sith" by Matthew Stover. This is the novelization of the third Star Wars movie, so I'm not even going to bother putting any plot in. You all know how this story goes, and if you don't, stop what you're doing, turn off your computer, and go to your local video rental store and get the movie. Then watch it. Watch it until your eyes bleed.
Welcome back, hope you enjoyed that experience. Though I'm usually a bit leery of books written about a movie, I thoroughly enjoyed this version of the third chapter in the classic Star Wars story. It adhered to the plot of the movie exceptionally well, and, at the same time, improved on the faults of the movie's narrative. I especially loved how Stover threw in so much symbolism and allegory, yet still kept the novel believable and fast paced. The characterization in this book is much deeper than even in the movie, and I loved every second of Stover's magnificent writing.
Review Score: 9/10
As always, this is Dresden, signing off.
Friday, March 23, 2012
The Biz on Vidz: BATTLE TIME! Superman vs. The Hulk
What up, err'body! Now, I know that I'm not the only person who used to wonder, "Who would win in a fight: Superman or The Hulk?" Well, this video will give you a good look at how a battle between these two God-like beings might go down if they were to duke it out! With laser-eyes, super-strength, and flying headbutts, these videos should give all of you an entertaining fight! Although there are currently only two parts to this fight (three if you count the video of their initial meeting), there will be another one made later on. I did not make these videos, so please don't yell at me to hurry up and make more! You can post a comment, if you want, and tell me who you think will win! (Personally, I put my money on superman). Here are links to the fight, along with the initial meeting:
Meeting
Part 1
Part 2
P.S. Also, if you would rather I post the videos directly on the blog/post instead of posting the links to the videos, tell me and I'll try to make adjustments for you guys (and girls *winky face*)!
Meeting
Part 1
Part 2
P.S. Also, if you would rather I post the videos directly on the blog/post instead of posting the links to the videos, tell me and I'll try to make adjustments for you guys (and girls *winky face*)!
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Greetings, Ladies and Gentlemen, this is Dresden.
Here's the fourth chapter of my short story Cold Nights, the action has finally started, and I'm sure you're all excited for that.
Chapter Four
And, as always, this is Dresden, signing off.
Here's the fourth chapter of my short story Cold Nights, the action has finally started, and I'm sure you're all excited for that.
Chapter Four
And, as always, this is Dresden, signing off.
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
The Zone: Crazy Feats (3)
Today's crazy feat is ramdom people doing awesome things. These people are a special kind and for that I'll show them to you. All posts will now be linked instead of in the open.
Click the ads for funds and ENJOY!!!
The Zone: Crazy Feats video 3
Click the ads for funds and ENJOY!!!
The Zone: Crazy Feats video 3
Political Minute: Why is Ron Paul Still Running?
As the primaries begin to wind down, many of us are wondering why Dr. Ron Paul is still running for the nomination. Well here's the reasons why.
Ron is quoted in saying, "Politicians don't amount to much, but ideas do." In other words, for Paul, it's about the message, not the office, says Ford O'Connell, chairman of the conservative Civic Forum PAC in Washington, D.C. "His intent is not to seek further office. He's trying to start a conversation about the direction of the country and the GOP."
It's the "Ron Paul Revolution". He doesn't want the nomination, per se, he wants to see a change in America. A change that we quite possibly could use. Maybe not quite as radical as his views, but his views are radical enough to leave a small impression on the younger crowd he has attained.
It wouldn't be the first time an upstart candidate has helped rechart the direction of the GOP. Until the 1960s, the Republican Party was largely an Eastern elitist organization. Though Barry Goldwater lost badly to incumbent Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 presidential election, he used his campaign to strengthen the resurgence of the conservative political movement throughout the 1960s.
It may be a long shot, but Paul backers hope that as acceptance grows for Paul's "revolution," so does the chance that a similar candidate – perhaps Rand Paul, whose views are much more electable – might one day win the White House.
Ron is quoted in saying, "Politicians don't amount to much, but ideas do." In other words, for Paul, it's about the message, not the office, says Ford O'Connell, chairman of the conservative Civic Forum PAC in Washington, D.C. "His intent is not to seek further office. He's trying to start a conversation about the direction of the country and the GOP."
It's the "Ron Paul Revolution". He doesn't want the nomination, per se, he wants to see a change in America. A change that we quite possibly could use. Maybe not quite as radical as his views, but his views are radical enough to leave a small impression on the younger crowd he has attained.
It wouldn't be the first time an upstart candidate has helped rechart the direction of the GOP. Until the 1960s, the Republican Party was largely an Eastern elitist organization. Though Barry Goldwater lost badly to incumbent Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 presidential election, he used his campaign to strengthen the resurgence of the conservative political movement throughout the 1960s.
It may be a long shot, but Paul backers hope that as acceptance grows for Paul's "revolution," so does the chance that a similar candidate – perhaps Rand Paul, whose views are much more electable – might one day win the White House.
The Book Store 6
Greetings, Ladies and Gentlemen, this is Dresden for The Book Store.
This time, I figured I'd go back to a classic work of literature again, thus, I chose To Kill a Mockingbird. Written by Harper Lee, and published in 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird is a novel set in the early 1900s Alabama, a time when racism was still an accepted part of society. It details the life of two small children, Jem and Scout, and their father Atticus Finch, over a series of years. The novel is beautifully written and a very enjoyable read. Loaded with subtle and overt symbolism, the story teaches you a lesson without boring you, and the plot is engrossing from the first page.
However, there is a certain amount of culture clash between the time this novel is set in and the modern world. And at some points the point of view, that of a child, is inadequate to properly convey some information properly.
Review Score: 9/10
Stay reading my friends, and, as always, this is Dresden, signing off.
This time, I figured I'd go back to a classic work of literature again, thus, I chose To Kill a Mockingbird. Written by Harper Lee, and published in 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird is a novel set in the early 1900s Alabama, a time when racism was still an accepted part of society. It details the life of two small children, Jem and Scout, and their father Atticus Finch, over a series of years. The novel is beautifully written and a very enjoyable read. Loaded with subtle and overt symbolism, the story teaches you a lesson without boring you, and the plot is engrossing from the first page.
However, there is a certain amount of culture clash between the time this novel is set in and the modern world. And at some points the point of view, that of a child, is inadequate to properly convey some information properly.
Review Score: 9/10
Stay reading my friends, and, as always, this is Dresden, signing off.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



